Pretend you have two good-sized buildings, not on the same campus, but a couple of city blocks apart, each with a few hundred users. The core of your UC system is in Building #1. Under Kari's law, what is your legal responsibility to the other building regarding Onsite Notification / Crisis Alert for 911 calls? Leave aside the issue of what one SHOULD do, I read Kari's Law as not strictly requiring one to provide crisis notification at Building #2 in this scenario, as long as you're sending that notification to a "person or organization regardless of location," such as Building #1.
Again, it would obviously be a GREAT idea to send the notification to someone in Building #2. I'm only trying to figure out the legal requirements.
Thoughts, @Mark Fletcher, @Kevin Kito, anyone?
Kari's Law says, in part (emphasis mine)
On-Site Notification.--A person engaged in the business of
installing, managing, or operating multi-line telephone systems shall,
in installing, managing, or operating such a system for use in the
United States, configure the system to provide a notification
to a central location at the facility where the system is installed or
to another person or organization regardless of location, if the system
is able to be configured to provide the notification without an
improvement to the hardware or software of the system.